Doesn't the NYTs have any sense of responsibility giving such front-page prominence to a "conclusion" all based on this "hypothesized" shit --
The researchers focused instead on the median age of the surveyors, 34, and they hypothesized that perhaps younger voters felt more comfortable than older voters submitting questionnaires to younger surveyors.When was a 34-age median considered young?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/20/politics/20exit.html?oref=loginLike WMD, maybe the paper o'record will get around to apologizing on page 18 for this tragic disservice to mankind.