Reply #40: The Russ Baker paper in TomPaine has been refuted convincingly

[Fly by night]

by Dr. Steven Freeman in a letter printed in the Nashua Advocate. Here's the link (you may have to scroll down a bit to find it):

http://nashuaadvocate.blogspot.com

I also wrote TomPaine to criticize them for publishing the very slipshod piece by Baker. Any one of us who has followed the accumulation of evidence for election theft could have done a better job than Baker. Dr. Freeman's letter is well worth reading.

I think the evidence for election fraud and theft is weighty, multi-faceted and convincing to even hard-core Republicans, when you have a chance to discuss it with them one-on-one. Why, I bet even Internet(s)-challenged Ted Koppel and Kookie Roberts could understand the evidence, if an informed DUer could cut through their layers of production assistants and senior producers to present the evidence to them face-to-face. If any of their staff are reading this, how about PMing me -- we'll put together an "election theft" posse and be at ABC within 24 hours to show all of you what truth looks like.

Of course, there are some (like the person(s) who thankfully appear as "ignored" on my version of this thread) who will never get it. Because they're not here to get it. If enough of us put them to sleep, they can go back to talking to themselves or to each other -- they know who "they" are. Try the "snooze" button on them, folks, you'll like it.