You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #9: Could this be seen as "progress" for us? [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

tommcintyre

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-29-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message

9. Could this be seen as "progress" for us?

Is this an indicator that they see the "handwriting on the wall", and that verified voting is inevitable? I realize that this is most likely intended as a diversionary tactic, but the fact that they are even acknowledging the "need" probabably means things are moving in the right direction.

Also, once again, free publicity is being given to the "problem". The very announcement of this "improvement" implies there is an existing problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.