You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Wash Post – AP Story: Sancho of FL – Stands up to Vendors & Jeb, FIGHTS B [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wash Post – AP Story: Sancho of FL – Stands up to Vendors & Jeb, FIGHTS B
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 09:58 PM by autorank
I apologize for at least 24 hours for for all the bad things I’ve said about the WaPost (unless this is in the online edition only, in which case they all stand). This is a great article and so true. Sancho actually tested a Diebold machine, AccuVote Tabulator, and showed it could be hacked under real-world conditions. For that, his alternate vendor, ESS, decided it could not sell him any machines themselves, as they were too busy. It was a SET UP, collusion. Sancho is not giving up. He’s suing back. He missed one of the idiot deadlines for HAVA and Jefville (aka FL) so the state his giving him grief. He won’t back down. Here’s to an honest man!


Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho:
Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho: "I'm being singled out for punishment."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/25/AR2006032500805.html
(By Phil Coale – Associated Press)

Now, however, Sancho may be paying an unexpected price for his whistle-blowing: None of the state-approved companies here will sell him the voting machines the county needs.



"I've essentially embarrassed the current companies for the way they do business, and now I believe I'm being singled out for punishment by the vendors," he said.

<snip>

"I'm very troubled by this, to be honest -- I can't believe the way he's being treated," said David Wagner, a computer scientist at the University of California at Berkeley who sits on a California board that reviews voting machine security. "What kind of message is this sending to elections supervisors?"

The dispute highlights what many elections experts say is a failure in federal oversight. In Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and elsewhere, elections officials have called into question the security and accuracy of new voting machines. The experts said that a more rigorous federal oversight process, in which machine testers have no financial connections to the voting machine companies, is needed to ensure election security in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC