You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Great Britain: “Premeditated Peerage” - Blair knew of loans before handin [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great Britain: “Premeditated Peerage” - Blair knew of loans before handin

Say it’s not so Tony! Please! You have such a great accent, it sure fooled a lot of Americans into trusting you when you came here to sell Iraq. You are so earnest and important, busy all the time. Seems you’re just another political crook who returns favors for money. The real term here should have been “Premeditated Peerage.”;)


Blair knew of loans before picking peers

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2104207,00.html
Robert Winnett March 26, 2006

TONY BLAIR knew that four businessmen had secretly loaned millions of pounds to Labour when he put them forward for peerages, a Downing Street insider has disclosed.

<snip>

The disclosure shows for the first time Blair’s hands-on role in the loans for honours scandal. He is thought to be the only person involved in choosing nominees who was aware of the identities of the financial supporters.

He had previously accepted responsibility only for a loans scheme without admitting he was fully informed of who the lenders were. However, the insider said: “When Blair selected his shortlist of peers he was aware of which ones had given loans. He was given a long list of names to choose from and personally selected which ones to put forward. The prime minister knew exactly what was going on with the loans from the very beginning.”

It has also emerged that the Appointments Commission, the watchdog that vets peerages, warned Blair informally after the general election it would no longer tolerate unsuitable candidates who had financially supported parties being elevated to the Lords. The warning is understood to have been prompted by a number of Labour and Tory nominees in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC