You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: But which experts are fake experts? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
mmarcus Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. But which experts are fake experts?
Are you saying that Hursti is a fake expert?

How is he "confusing the issue"?

If no one was paying attention but now they are why is that a bad thing?

The best thing you said (in my opinion) is that we don't trust experts because no one knows what experts to trust. Isn't that the whole problem with any elections model that is dependent on experts? It's like in court when you have two competing experts and both are tuned out.

Maybe experts should be tuned out of our elections process and it should be given back to the people so they can oversee it themselves without having to have computer expertise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC