You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: BWC tried to keep $215M loss under wraps prior to '04 vote [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. BWC tried to keep $215M loss under wraps prior to '04 vote
Thanks to rosebud57 for the post and the DU discussion here..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x445910
Toledo Blade reports on '04 machinations to save Bush, Voinovich, etc.


BWC tried to keep $215M loss under wraps prior to '04 vote
Documents reflect director's concern about possible 'leak'

COLUMBUS - Less than a week before the 2004 presidential election, Jim Conrad, then head of the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, took steps to ensure that a $215 million investment loss in an offshore hedge-fund would not become public, documents obtained by The Blade show.

On Oct. 27, 2004 - just six days before President Bush was re-elected after narrowly winning Ohio - Mr. Conrad expressed his concern about a potential "leak" of the losses in an e-mail to John Annarino, then the bureau's chief legal counsel and ethics officer. In the e-mail, Mr. Conrad advised how Mr. Annarino and James McLean, then the bureau's investment director, should manage the agency's investment staff to keep the potentially explosive losses under wraps.<snip>

On Sept. 27, 2004, Mr. Conrad, the bureau's administrator-CEO, was giving a speech in Cincinnati when he received a call from Ms. Kielmeyer, then the bureau's chief operating officer. She told Mr. Conrad that an employee had told her about an investment gone bad. That evening, Mr. McLean told Mr. Conrad in a conference call that when he wanted to "tighten the screws" on MDL, Gasper had told him that Mr. Conrad had given permission to "give MDL a break.''<snip> Mr. McLean said he was instructed by Mr. Annarino "to make sure that the staff was kept content and happy so that they would not reveal any information on MDL."<snip> "Keeping a lid on the MDL losses was not something that I simply assumed Mr. Annarino wanted; it was a straightforward mandate," Mr. McLean wrote. "The Bureau did not want any information on MDL to get out and I was to cooperate with that mandate."<snip>

http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060813/NEWS24/608130338/-1/NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC