You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Comparing FL 13 to NC 08 Congressional Races [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 01:02 AM
Original message
Comparing FL 13 to NC 08 Congressional Races
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Jan-16-07 01:40 AM by WillYourVoteBCounted
I would like to supply information not covered by
the "Scoop" article about the NC 08 and FL 13 contests



Wrong Winner Chosen Twice by Same Voting Machine
Monday, 15 January 2007, 4:42 pm
Article: Michael Collins
Congress Seats Two Clear “Losers”
Wrong Winner Chosen Twice by Same Voting Machine
Examining Florida 13th and North Carolina 8th
Congressional Districts Leaves Little Doubt
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0701/S00173.htm


The scoop article says that the same problems in FL 13 happened
in NC 08 in Mecklenburg County NC.


Some of the information for this article may have come from this website:


The Mysterious Mecklenburg Undervote of 2006
In the November 2, 2006 election, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
had several very close results in both national and state races...
http://home.earthlink.net/~meckvote06/
The website info was was put together by Vinod Thomas,
an observer for the Larry Kissell campaign. (This is very interesting)


However, an examination of the data at the Mecklenburg County BOE website
shows:



the Mecklenburg County undervote was 4%. 150,952 of 157,252 voters,
or 95.99%, cast a vote for a US Representative. Isn't that normal,
more or less? From the summary http://www.meckboe.org/pages/Election/Summary.html ,


Meanwhile - A few things not covered in the article:

1. NC has a different version iVotronic than Sarasota,
and it has a "paper trail".



2. Larry Kissell (D) requested and obtained
a manual recount of the VVPAT in Mecklenburg County.



Larry Kissell's attorneys and observers were there,
and reporters were there.

In spite of what some say, at least some voters do check their paper printout,
regardless of what others say. I know because I hear from people.

The State Board of Elections advised me that -
"instructions were also included (page 13) in the four million voter guides"
(instructions on how to verify the vote on the iVotronic)


3. Carrie Levine, reporter for the Charlotte Observer stated that she observed
the recount and that it did follow protocol and the law completely.



Levine answered my many questions thoroughly, because I had so many doubts.
(I had heard doubts from an observer).
clevine @ charlotteobserver.com

Levine, who has done some good writing on election issues was
adament that the paper was recounted as the law orders.

Levine advised that the "paper trail" was extremely difficult to recount,
because the iVotronic doesn't print a summary, but prints everything, and it
takes longer to find the final selection in a contest. Counters had to go back and
count some ballots several times because they were very very hard to read.


4. The Scoop article says that NC 08 was a stronghold for Larry Kissell,(DEM).



How can the NC 08th be a stronghold for Larry Kissell,
considering that Kissell is a high school social studies
teacher
and former textiles worker who never ran for office before,
and who did not get serious backing from the democratic party?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Kissell


Kissell's opponent, Robin Hayes (R) is also the incumbent,
and has held the seat since 1999.

Before that, Hayes served two terms in the NC House of Reps.
Hayes was the GOP nominee for Governor in 1996. Kissell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hayes


Kissell did not get support from the Democratic Party:


Dismissal of Kissell backfires
When Kissell called the Democratic bigwigs in Washington
asking for a little help with his congressional campaign,
he couldn't get his telephone calls returned, said Thomas Mills,
one of Kissell's consultants.

With little help from Washington, Kissell was outspent roughly 8-to-1
by Republican U.S. Rep. Robin Hayes.

http://www.newsobserver.com/114/story/517366.html


5. Incorrect ballots were given out in split precincts,
and probably did impact the NC 08 contest to a degree.


"446 wrongly voted in razor-thin Black race
Poll workers blamed; speaker stands to gain

Charlotte Observer, NC - Nov 15, 2006

Hundreds of voters who don't live in N.C. House Speaker Jim Black's
district improperly cast ballots
in the tight race,
Mecklenburg election officials said Tuesday
http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/16014781.htm


Additionally, NC has early voting, and this is another grand
opportunity to give alot of voters the wrong ballots.
Mecklenburg County would have at least 80 different ballot
styles to offer at each early voting site.

(About 1/3 of all ballots are cast early).



6. Larry Kissell conceded halfway through the recount.
Mecklenburg was the 5th of 10 counties to be recounted.


Kissell concedes defeat
News 14 Carolina, NC - CHARLOTTE - With defeat appearing inevitable,
Larry Kissell conceded Wednesday
to GOP Rep. Robin Hayes in the state's
8th Congressional District, ending one of the nation's last unresolved
races for a seat in the U.S. House.
5 of the remaining counties had not done a recount
http://rdu.news14.com/content/headlines/?ArID=95335&SecID=2



If anyone would like to research this matter more fully,
that would be great.


But I am unable to confirm dishonesty in the vote counting
teams that worked in Mecklenburg County.


I tried. But I have to report only what I can confirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC