You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Thanks for the update; I knew you wanted to hear from the witnesses. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks for the update; I knew you wanted to hear from the witnesses.
I responded in another thread on this topic earlier and was severely attacked, along with NC and the NC ER activists. I still don't understand what set the other poster off.

I had responded that the new NC election law is stronger than that of FL and I believe it might be barely enough to allow detection of election fraud. I also said that I thought it was the best we could do with the legislature and environment we had.

Do you know if anyone has actually examined the sourcecode et al as provided by the new law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC