Reply #49: Yeah, rinsd, are we know how well touchscreens worked in Ohio!

[Peace Patriot]

...changed Kerry votes to Bush votes all day long, without repair or correction in many cases. Astronomical odds against that happening--only in Bush's favor, never Kerry's. When voters flipped back to page one, to check their vote before pushing the button to record, they found their Kerry vote changed to Bush vote. They changed it back. Then checked again--changed again. They complained, and COULD NOT GET VERIFICATION that their Kerry vote remained a Kerry vote. And these were just the most alert voters--those who checked! Touchscreens were notorious in Ohio.

So, HOW MUCH was Alameda against the Recall? And how was that verified? BushCons don't always steal votes in the most obvious places. In No. Carolina, they manufactured a 9% edge for Bush over and above what he should have gotten, in the electronic vote (vs. absentee/early voting)--creating and padding his nationwide popular majority. He would have won No. Carolina anyway. And in San Bernadino County, CA, there was a mysterious vote of some thousands of people for Barbara Boxer and Bush (obviously votes stolen from Kerry).

It was the BREAKDOWN of Diebold machines in Alameda that was one of the things that prompted Shelley to decertify and sue Diebold!

Things are not well in our voting system, to say the least. And you should never presume that any official numbers you get are real. Literally every vote must be checked against precinct sign-in sheets.