Using the "P" word

[garybeck]

PROOF

I'm sick of hearing people say there is no proof.

"Yeah, there are suspicions, but there's no way to prove the election was stolen."

BS

I've had trial lawyers tell me that people have been convicted of murder on less evidence than we've already seen.

There hasn't even been a trial, and people say there is no proof. Normall if there is an accusation of a crime, there is a trial, and then lawyers get subpeona power, to go look for proof. Without a trial, our hands are tied to look for proof.

Still, having said that, I say there is already proof now.

When a consortium of PhD statistians analyze the exit polls and say that there is a 16 million to 1 chance that they were off by that much just by chance... that is proof to me that SOMETHING happened.

when 7 Ohio recount witnesses saw white stickers on the ballots, covering up Kerry votes, and one of them took a photograph of them, ... that sure sounds like proof to me.

I could go on and most of you are familiar with it...

What I'm trying to say it's OK to use the "P" word. Next time someone says there isn't any proof, tell them there is.

The entire system being set up as it is, with Repubicans counting the votes in secret, with the exit polls being off by so much, with the white stickers, with the long lines, with all the "glitches"... it all adds up to PROOF. Ultimately proof is a subjective and relative word, I guess that eventually comes into the hands of a jury. In my book there's more than enough evidence to call it proof.