You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: Militant was the wrong word [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Andromeway Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #128
129. Militant was the wrong word
Well, I'm coming from a different perspective. Nobody had to convince me that gods don't exist. I grew up in a mostly non-religious household, so that allowed me to start questioning the merits of numerous theological arguments from a fairly young age. I think my "aha!" moment came when I was twelve or thirteen. I began thinking in depth about the plausibility of souls and the afterlife and all these other things, and I essentially ruled each one out. So, from there, I concluded that if every other religious argument (and supernatural arguments, in general) falls apart when faced against facts and reason, why should gods be any different. Bear in mind, I didn't actively believe in a god at this point, but I was far closer to true agnosticism than I am today. I still don't actively DIS-believe in god, I simply put the notion out of my head.

Therein lies the biggest problem with the term atheist as used by most people. I classify myself as one for simplicity's sake. I'm still agnostic to a degree. I haven't completely ruled out the possibility that some being, be it alien or supernatural, created the universe. But whether or not such a being exists remains irrelevant to my life. I would change nothing of how I live or how I think if I knew an "all-powerful" being existed somewhere. At most, this being or force started the universe and let it run its course. It's certainly not involved in the everyday workings of our universe. Does such a thing deserve anyone's worship?

As far as the term militant, I didn't come up with it. I concede that it's probably a poor choice and I shouldn't have used it. I just wish Dawkins would spend the bulk of his time going in-depth about evolution rather than trying to convert the religious. The topic is fascinating, and like I said, Dawkins is a brilliant biologist with decades of experience in his field. He comes off as trite when he's rambling on about the non-existence of a god. But as I said, I don't need convincing, so perhaps my view is skewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC