You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: How completely wrong. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
SlackJawedYokel Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. How completely wrong.
Your statistics are also valuable for the claim that abortion causes breast cancer.
Aside from the fact that a 65,000 woman cohort study done on nurses completley disproved that piece of proganda, how do you figure that one?

There is absolutely no way to verify the statistical groups of women who developed or did not develop breast cancer after a such a brief pregnancy.
Which categorizes such a claim as "statistically insignificant".

IIRC, a preganancy is defined as the implantation, not merely the conception, of a zygote.
So those women who conceive but don't implant aren't pregnant.

Cletus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC