that's kinda lock solid stuff huh. The league looked at five year old evidence provided by the accused and found nothing incriminating, add to the mix that the accused said they didn't do it and you got an airtight case. And don't forget the "suggestion" is false. Well gooolllly, give billichick back his fine money cause there is no way the evidence found a few months ago could possibly incriminate to the point of a guilty finding. Ooh but we can't take a look at that evidence anymore can we.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
