You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: There's one major impediment to your premise . . . [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. There's one major impediment to your premise . . .
Edited on Fri Dec-17-04 04:58 AM by TaleWgnDg
marriage grants legal rights, privileges, benefits, obligations and duties to both married-partners. There's approximately 1,100 federal laws that kick in if one is married. There's approximately 300 or so State laws (depending upon which State) that kick in to marrieds-only.

Now, that is what it's all about. Only marriage grants these rights, not so-called "civil unions." That's the impediment to your theory.

If there were so-called "civil unions" state-to-state, there is no guarantee that State A would grant the same or similar legal rights than would State B, etc. In other words, there'd be no uniformity in "civil unions" as there is in law to marriage; and there would be no way to format a uniformity in law as to all the States.

As for federal law, so-called "civil unions" is a zero. A huge zero. Can you imagine the federal congress re-writing over 1,100 laws to apply equally to "civil unions" as those laws apply to marriage? Of course not.

In application it would be like this:

1.) I get married. My marriage is legally enforceable and recognizable in law in all the States including the territories and the federal government and across the entire planet. My family (in marriage) including my children may rely upon and obtain privileges, duties, obligations, and burdens of marriage across my State, and all States and territories in America, plus foreign nation recognition. (However, it's still questionable as to what weight a same-sex marriage may have in some foreign nations.)

2.) However, if I have a "civil union," I don't know what my State grants me and it varies State-to-State and it's completely unenforceable State-to-State, and it's a zero both federally and internationally. My children will suffer from not having the protections of state, federal, and foreign laws of married parents. My grandchildren would also suffer as do my children.

If you are so inclined to read further on this issue, try this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=221&topic_id=2401&mesg_id=2604




. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC