Reply #31: DAMS is a non-profit; coordinators are not paid; their only income

[philb]

is membership dues and book sales; and thats not much. But they have lots of volunteers who have recovered
from chronic conditions caused by dental amalgam mercury. You can find out more about DAMS at http://www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1/indexd.html
and http://www.amalgam.org
DAMS has an international newsletter you could also check out? They accept comments on articles.

My conclusions are similar to those of the World Health Organization and U.S. Department of Health(ATSDR) and the Gov'ts of Sweden and Norway and Germany and etc. who I quote directly; and to that of many hundreds of researchers; and thousands of dentists; and etc. My conclusions are the same as those of the many peer-reviewed studies and Gov't studies that I reference. If you have followed other threads on this you know I can also reference statements in hearings and court by some of the most prestigious Univ. researchers on these topics from Chemistry Departments such as Univ. of Kentucky and FSU and others.
I just summarize the articles. Are you saying that you disagree with some of my summary statements or the "fact sheets" on the page above? they are all fully referenced. I think your problem may be that you interact more with politicians and special interest lobbyist than with scientist and researchers- for whom there is considerable consensus. Unfortunately some politicians don't seem very interested in science these days.

Again I ask: specifically which statement or conclusion do you disagree with and why?