You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: Keep Your Eye On The Ball [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Laxman Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Keep Your Eye On The Ball
The most important message that Feingold's letter sets forth is to concentrate, not on some specious debate about why the administration was spying, but upon the illegality of the actions. Mr. Rove and his minions are brilliantly adept at framing public debate. They have succeeded in bringing the conversation regarding the illegal wiretaps and other constitutional transgressions into the realm of being some sort of scholarly debate over the separation of powers in our government and where its just a question of interpretation. Of course in these "grey" areas, we must err on the side of protecting our nation from the bogey men and other assorted evil doers out there waiting to do us harm. The real fact of the matter is that they never expected to get caught trashing those pesky legal technicalities in the Bill of Rights. When they were caught the misinformation machine was immediately turned to the spin cycle and we have this bogus debate over the inherent powers of the presidency. Now, even in the event that the Supreme Court decides against the president, it won't be an impeachable offense, just an honest disagreement over an interpretation of the Constitution that took the wise and learned judgment of the Supreme Court to settle. You've got to hand it to them, they really know how to manipulate public debate. Meanwhile, with the public having the attention span of a hyperactive golden lab puppy, a deliberate and cynically planned disregard of the restraints on government power go unchecked and unpunished. No matter what the political ramifications of Senator Feingold's censure motion may ultimately be, the questions need to be asked regarding just what took place. Hard as it may be to believe, if we don't, there will be some future administration even less enlightened than this one which will show up and show even more disregard for our liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC