Reply #46: Looking at the links you provided,

[johnaries]

2 of them quote Sada, who incidentally "has a book coming out". I suspect he simply wants to generate book sales.

One of them claims that David Kay said "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD program". Another quotes Kay as having said:"The bulk of the evidence really points to -- that things did go to Syria, but they weren't weapons of mass destruction or weapons material," Kay added. He said there is "no evidence" that Iraq ever produced any large amounts of chemical nerve agents after 1991. "In fact, all the evidence is just the opposite," he told NPR.

But let's use a little logic. If Saddam thought the US was about to attack, WHY would he send his WMD's to Syria? Why wouldn't he keep them to use against us instead of hiding in a "spider hole"?

Not only is there no credible evidence, but it simply doesn't make any sense that he would do it. It just doesn't pass the "smell" test.