Reply #43: Your OP claims "They listened to Scott Ritter"

[ConsAreLiars]

A blatant lie. If they had listened to Ritter they would have voted against the slaughter in Iraq. Why you want to claim they "listened to Scott Ritter" is impossible for me to understand. He argued strongly - very strongly - against the invasion. And suggesting that voting to authorize that slaughter was somehow caused by what Ritter said is delusional, at the very best.

Now you say that the Iraq War Resolution was somehow a vote to continue inspections and not a vote to authorize war. Well, OK. I guess 99% of the Republicans voted that way because they wanted to prevent the war also. Okey Dokey. Have it your way.

But the main topic, somehow lost in this mess of false accusations against Ritter, was this: Why do they continue to lie (hide, ignore, cover up) the fact that butchering a few hundred thousand men, women, and children in Iraq was the consequence of a plan for world domination by the use of US military power in Irag. Why do they not point out that this plan was spelled out in full detail in the PNAC papers, and signed onto by 75% of the top officials in this government.

Why do they lie? Tell me. And don't keep saying that "Scott Ritter made them do it." That is obviously a lie.