Reply #53: So you claim Ritter fooled them with his 1998 comments

[ConsAreLiars]

(grossly misundersttod and misrepresented) about the need to continue inspections, but they never heard his very loud warnings against voting for the invasion in 2002-3? Really?

And somehow that means that their silence about PNAC is a good thing (or excusable, or praiseworthy, or what?). I think your vote should be "other," or maybe I should have added another category of "Other worldly/ delusional."

Blood. Lots of blood. On their hands, and yours. But don't worry. Be happy. They were just ignorant fools and had no clue, I guess. If that's your best case in defense of that vote, well, you didn't need to bring up some out of context misrepresentation of something Ritter said several years previously to make your case. Just say they were morons.