You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #146: I'm with you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Brothaman2k Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #88
146. I'm with you
Edited on Wed Mar-22-06 03:33 AM by Brothaman2k
Like I said earlier in the thread, I don't think this is the result of a conspiracy, but a criminal act. I mean think about it....

The Administration had him killed? Well, for whatever reason they'd want to do this, this is a whole lot of one thing we know this secretive cabal doesn't want... EXPOSURE. In order to have someone killed you have to find an assassin to do the job. That means you have to make contacts and make your intentions known to somebody. What if the people you ask to do the job refuse? What if they refuse and go to the press?! No, no, no... WAAAAAAAAAAY too risky. Now if I'd heard about some mysterious soldier or soldiers who came in for a few days and disappeared after Tillman was killed and they can't be tracked down. Now I could say it was plausible that they were handpicked, black bag, clandestine agents for the job, but we don't have that here.

They had him killed because he objected to the war on terror? If he objects he objects. Shit there were thousands objecting when this went down, didn't make a damn bit of difference. What's one more? Did Tillman make headlines when he left the NFL for the army, sure. It was all the rage for a few days. Then it disappeared from the headlines until he was killed. Could his semi-high profile status been a campaign tool for Dems? Sure, but it's not like the entire election would have hinged on him. His story was compelling, but it wasn't THAT huge.

I'm telling you, this is no conspiracy, it was a flat criminal act. Much has been made of the antiwar sentiment Tillman wrote in his diary, but diaries are really meant for people to document their days. The stuff they've seen and heard. Now on a battlefield with fire fights and people dying it's not a leap to suggest if he ever saw some kind of act that might be considered a war crime, he would have documented it in the diary. Now, if he was known as the honest, "boyscout" type those who commited the illegal act would have seen him as a threat and silencing him a way to keep him from getting them thrown in jail. I say Tillman was a witness to something and soldiers in his unit killed him and snatched the diary to cover it up.

That's a much more likely scenario.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC