I think the term freelance isn't really the best term for his relationship with the church. Seems more an independent contractor relationship. If so he is being hired by them for taking pictures, just as if I hire someone to take pictures of my wedding. If they take some unflattering pictures, I would hope they can't sell them to whoever they want. I don't agree with the Church's decision but I think they own the pictures.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
