Reply #8: Great post!!!

[im10ashus]

I don't see how they can say, however, that 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) "as applied to them in this case, section 793 is unconstitutionally vague and violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech."

It seems pretty clear to me:

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000793----000-.html

I am working my way through the Order now. I will try and get back to this a little later.

Thanks, H20 Man!

K&R!

:kick: