You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: No, the photographer still owns the rights [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-31-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
55. No, the photographer still owns the rights
If it was a simple verbal agreement like "here, we'll give you a hundred bucks to go photograph Scalia."

In that case, the photographer will take the photos, process them, pick out the ones he knows the Archdiocese will want (most likely excluding the one in question)and give him either a CD or prints.

The photographer is then allowed to sell any of those photos, including the ones he handed over to the Archdiocese, to any news publication.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC