You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #135: We really don't need to know the specifics [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #100
135. We really don't need to know the specifics
we forget that driving is not a right, it is a privilege. The more crowded the roads are, the more defensive we have to drive. From a lapse in attention while changing channels on a radio, to reaching into a glove box, to chatting on the phone, to shaving and putting makeup, to reading, to trying to control the kids, to chat with other passengers, to just thinking of something else - all take out attention from concentrating on driving. Yes, I am guilty of some of these too.

Our frantic 24/7 multitasking lives also exist in our cars.

Yes, many cyclists are rude and do not obey the rules of the road, weaving, etc. But when it comes to a collision, with thousands of pounds of steel against flesh and blood, the steel will always win (with some exception if the flesh and blood are that of a moose).

What if a child runs into the street? The driver has to be the one to be blamed because we have to watch for these distractions and to be ready to break. Yes, even steer the car to a pole or to another car to avoid hitting a person. Unfortunately the police too often does not issue a citation, determining that this was "an accident." Yes, I know that drivers will feel like hell for the rest of their lives; at least I hope so. But perhaps we do need to stop dismissing these "accidents" so that drivers will pay attention to the consequences of taking their eyes off the road.

The irony is that the same newspaper has a complaint from someone who decided to take his bike to work, but two buses passed with their racks already loaded with two bikes each, so he had to call his wife to take him back home and drove to work with his gas guzzling car.

If we really want to get more people to cycle to work, we need to make sure that they are safe, especially when there are dedicated bike lanes. Not all communities have them.

My spouse cycled to work today and when I reported how this issue touched a raw nerve here, the response was: and if this is on DU, just imagine how it would be on a freeper forum..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC