You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Christians just continued an old tradition [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Christians just continued an old tradition
Remember Nero was OVERTHROWN by Galba (Who subsequent died and whose killers were overthrown by Vespasian). Titus Flavius Vespasianus (A.D. 69-79) had to justify his reign by demonizing Nero's.

In the only non-Christian or non-Jewish reference to the Early Christians, Tacitus' Annales 15.38-44,http://artemis.austincollege.edu/acad/HWC22/Rome/Pagans_v_Christians/Tacitus.html, Tacitus mentions two reasons for the fire (Tacitus tends to ALWAYS write two reasons, like one is the GIVEN Reason at the time of the incident, the other is the REAL Reason). The second causation for the fire one being that the Nero blamed the Christians (after mentioning that most people blamed Nero who wanted the area for a new Palace for himself). A clear reading of Tacitus indicates a clear dislike of Christians, but also that it was clear that the Christians did NOT start the fire, but they were a easy target for Nero to blame for the Fire. Furthermore as Emperor, Nero was SUPPOSE to help people in distressed, thus his opening up of temple and public buildings to the homeless was what was EXPECTED of the Emperor. That fact he provided NO new Housing and instead built his new Palace on the spot of the fire just reinforced two things, First Nero started the fire to build his Palace, and two, Nero did NOTHING to help the people of Rome to recover from the Fire. When Nero lost the support of the People of Rome do to his handing of the Fire, his lack of support in the Senate and in the Army meant he was do to be overthrown and he was.

My point is Nero had been attacked by NON-Christians during the reign of Vespasian, and the Christians continued this tradition. A secondary factor was Vespasian started the "Flavian" dynasty. Constantine started the "Neo-Flavian" dynasty. These two Dynasty ere over 200 years apart but Constantine seems to have traced his family back to the first Fl avian Dynasty. This just reinforced the existing anti-Nero view among Christians.



http://www.roman-emperors.org/nero.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC