You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #128: In this case.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #119
128. In this case..
the "ammunition" she gave to her detractors refers to the fact she failed to be scrupulously "clean" in terms of her office Ithe Isaac Hayes issue), at a time when she knew her strong (and brave) stances would keep her in the spotlight. In terms of "strategy," I'd say that was NOT a bad use of the word-- It implies taking a quick breath and considering HOW to deliver your strong message. To not consider ones message runs the risk of inadvertently calling out proponents who are trying to defend your positions because of a disagreement in their word choices...


I didn't use (nor did Marshall) the word "strategy" to imply NOT acting and not boldly speaking out. Strategy is this case implies merely to try to avoid ones message being misinterpreted. If even this small amount of criticism makes Josh Marshall and I tantamount to her RW detractors, then so be it. Do we really require this level of "lock step" philosophical purity?"

Again, the irony, since my post was emphasizing my attempts to set my liberal sister "straight" on the facts after the Atlanta media had focused on the Hayes incident and left the impression with her that McKinney's "self-importance" made her ignore the guard and result in her "physical assault" on the guard. My sister has now heard McKinney's side of the story--from ME. :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC