Reply #28: The hell they do.

[Bolo Boffin]

For example, Gage's use of an Oslo, Norway controlled demolition shows how he fabricates data to support his otherwise insupportable claims. From a great overview article:

Fake Demolition Audio

This example is used by Richard Gage of ae911truth.org in his slide presentation.

Start by visiting the ImplosionWorld Cinema. Choose the Philips building (top of the two rows, right-hand side) and watch the video. Pay particular attention when the timer gets past 10 seconds. You'll hear an explosion, see smoke shoot out from the centre base of the building, then hear another set of explosions, then the building falls. Repeat that a few times so you're familar with the timing.

Take a look at the same implosion from another angle. We don't have the same view of the base of the building this time, but you can still hear loud explosions before and after first smoke shoots out.

Now visit this page at the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

And isn't that strange? Now there's no explosions at all, and what's more you can hear the building fall before it actually happens. It appears this version of the video has either had the explosions removed and seen the rest of the collapse sound moved forward to cover it (which would explain the silent second or two at the end), or perhaps has had the complete audio track added from somewhere else.

Gage does crap like this all through his PowerPoint presentation. He misstates facts about the buildings, he asserts a list of controlled demolitions features by his own scant authority, he continually misstates the actual collapse times of 7 World Trade, he misrepresents source material like the NIST report...

He talks about finding no evidence of layered floors in parts of his speech, and then shows pictures of the "meteorites" from Ground Zero, chunks of, you guessed it, layered floors compressed together!

He uses a total of 8 clips from 911 Mysteries, the most shoddily written piece of lies and deceit yet produced by anyone in the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Richard Gage is a liar. His arguments are INVALID and based on false premises. He's literally out for a free lunch.

I fucking deny your false dichotomy, Junk. I don't join one tiny bit with people "who would make all questioning illegal." That's pretty insulting, and if you repeat such a scandalous charge, I will report you to the moderators for attacking me. Got it?

BTW: I don't give a fuck what bluff and bluster does for you. My argument is based on the truth. Defend some more liars, why don't you?