You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: And when there is a terrorist attack which is "conclusively proved" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
51. And when there is a terrorist attack which is "conclusively proved"
to have been spawned by Iran, the hawks will offer a new bill demanding action against Iran, and point to this one saying "everybody agreed then that Iran was a threat - unanimously! What has changed, except the reality of an attack on Americans/US soil?" Then, everone who voted for this will have to explain how Iran could be a threat, worthy of further investigations/sanctions/whatever, but not be a threat after it actually attacked.

It's a set up for the next Tonkin Resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC