You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FITZ RESTS HIS CASE: Libby Prosecutors Finish Their Case in CIA Leak Trial [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 04:24 PM
Original message
FITZ RESTS HIS CASE: Libby Prosecutors Finish Their Case in CIA Leak Trial
Advertisements [?]
Libby Prosecutors Finish Their Case in CIA Leak Trial (Update1)

By Laurie Asseo

Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Prosecutors completed their case in Lewis ``Scooter'' Libby's perjury trial after NBC journalist Tim Russert was questioned by the defendant's lawyer over why he resisted a subpoena to testify after being interviewed by the FBI.

Russert testified yesterday he didn't tell Libby an Iraq war critic's wife was a Central Intelligence Agency official or discuss her at all in their conversation around July 10, 2003. Libby told a grand jury under oath that Russert brought up CIA official Valerie Plame during their conversation and that Libby didn't discuss her with any other journalist in the days before that talk.

Today, defense lawyer Ted Wells asked repeatedly why Russert fought a 2004 subpoena to testify before the grand jury while he agreed to being questioned by a Federal Bureau of Investigation official in November 2003 when he disputed Libby's account of their conversation.

In testifying before a grand jury, ``you never know what questions will be asked and that's why we fought the subpoena so vigorously,'' Russert said. He said the FBI investigator was the one providing information: namely that Libby said Russert disclosed Plame's identity. ``That was very important to me to correct that misstatement,'' the journalist said.

more at:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aMDDYOwyMYok&refer=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC