You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #77: Well, the amendment is non-binding
[View All]
candymarl
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-26-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
77. Well, the amendment is non-binding |
|
That said, if the real deal is introduced later and Democrats vote against it won't they start the flip-flopper thing again, maybe? That Democrats were "for it before they were against it"? That's my major concern. Perhaps that's what Senator Webb was concerned about.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.