Reply #28: you can hang on to that if you want to make you feel better about your own prevaricating candidate

[bigtree]

but Richardson, Gravel, and Kucinich stand apart from the others who obviously see a need to perpetuate Bush occupation with their residual forces.

Protecting an embassy isn't the same thing at all as the continued occupation the others described, and it's just not credible for those candidates or any of their supporters to compare that to their own hunger for more militarism in Iraq.