Reply #127: A. it was neither ad hominem nor an attack.

[motocicleta]

You truly sound unhinged. I figure if you can't tell someone they need help over the internet, when can you? I truly want you to get help. No attack.

B. You did not answer my question regarding dishonesty. If you want to believe in democracy, and I do, I do not see how you can hold a small group of people honestly expressing their opinions through voting responsible for something in which many more people also took part. I have no idea what you mean by dishonesty, nor do I particularly care, but it matters that you are either too cowardly to respond or too disconnected to be able to explain.

C. I did not ask for an apology. I do not need an apology from someone so out of bounds wacky.

D. Why are you so illogical and unhinged? It is well known that some small percentage of votes were taken from Gore because Nader was in the race. It is not well known that because those few percentage points of voters existed, no one else is responsible for Bush. In fact, not only is it not well known, it is highly irrational and stupid. Whatever happened to the MSM, Congress, SCOTUS, and populace? You want to blame all evil on 3% of the voting electorate? The mind boggles.
So when I ask for you to explain your rationale, you cannot lean back on the small percentage of Nader-haters who share your views. Because you share opinions with a miniscule group of people does not make you rational. I seriously doubt "everybody but that strain of anti-Democratic Party subversives that did it" agrees that we can blame all Bush's evil on those Nader voters, even while we all regret that those voters did what they did.

Tactical

Progressive

appears

to

be

neither.

And I am shocked that I am the only one on your ignore list, but I wear it as a badge of honor. You are one of the most hate-filled and least intelligent people I have had the displeasure to interact with here at DU. I did want you to find help; now I do not care.