Reply #11: I just answered my first reaction to the OP. I didn't start the OP. Hey, I think

[John Q. Citizen]

Kathryn Harris fits it better than Hill, but I answered the question posed in the OP honestly, forth-rightly, and without guile or deception.

I just put down the first fictional charicture I thought of when I read the OP's question.

If you want to do a search of my postings on Hill, you will see that I don't often compare her to any fictional charicture. In fact I don't know if I ever have before.

Instead I tend to analyse her based on policies and votes.

For instance, I have said many times that Hillary is a hawk, because that is what her voting record, as well as her speeches, show.

By a hawk, I mean she appaerntly believes that military action against other countries is a good and acceptible way to achieve US stratigic goals.

Is military action which results in the death of many innocents cruel? I think so.