Reply #137: yes, I thought about that

[Two Americas]

I thought about stating strong opinions in the OP, then decided not to. You really can't win when you raise certain subjects, and your motives will be attacked no matter what. But really I have more questions than opinions, so I don't know what strong opinion I would have expressed, other than that the election theft was a crime, and there was an inadequate response and there still remains a reluctance to discussing it. Gore just happens to be the main player in the drama, so of course we need to mention him. In my opinion, Gore is not the one to be "blamed" as it is complex and there were many players, and it goes without saying that the perpetrators are by far the primary villains. I am more interested in what people here think than I am about Gore. I think I have been respectful to the other posters and to Gore. If you think I have abused either, point that out. It was not my intention.

What innuendo about Gore are you seeing? What is the game you think I am playing?

What does "all over this thread in a New York minute" mean if not mob action?

I do think that questioning the motives of a poster, based on speculation, is a personal attack. hard to see it as anything else. If you assume that there are things I am not saying and that I am being devious, then of course you can imagine all sorts of things that I am not saying. But I can't possibly be expected to respond to that. How can I prove that I am not secretly trying to destroy Gore? I can't.