For those who lived under a bridge without a TV, meet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace">Nancy Grace. She also wrote the book
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1401301800/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top">Objection!: How High-Priced Defense Attorneys, Celebrity Defendants, and a 24/7 Media Have Hijacked Our Criminal.
IMO, what is more dangerous than her Roman Colosseum style is her attack on the Constitution in
Objection!.
If she got her way, there would be far more innocents convicted than the
http://www.innocentproject.org/Content/530.php">Innocence Project found so far.
If Nancy Grace played a dominant role in the drafting of the Constitution, what would we have?
Nor do I believe that phony, condescending voice she uses to pretend her empathy is genuine. It's a practiced voice, you know the one, softer, lower, slower speech, but she snaps out of it on que, which makes her concern for victims suspect. And yet she wants the law to accept that phony emotion. True, with some of the cases it is impossible not to have some of the same empathy and rage, but I still don't think she is totally genuine most of the time. Maybe she's getting even for getting slapped down not once, not twice, but three times by appellate courts.
Is she dangerous to what we value under the Constitution? Does she hate us for our freedoms?