You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

58% RE-default on "modified mortgages" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 03:18 PM
Original message
58% RE-default on "modified mortgages"
Advertisements [?]
http://www.housingwire.com/2008/12/08/redefaults-a-problem-occs-dugan-says/

Redefaults a Problem, OCC’s Dugan Says
By PAUL JACKSON
December 8, 2008

As if you couldn’t see this one coming a mile away: more than half of the loans modified in the first quarter of 2008 had redefaulted within six months of modification, according to statistics released Monday by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “After three months, nearly 36 percent of the borrowers had re-defaulted by being more than 30 days past due,” Comptroller John Dugan said in a statement. “After six months, the rate was nearly 53 percent, and after eight months, 58 percent.”

In other words, recidivism rates are right where they historically have been, despite growing pressure to “do something” about a growing number of foreclosures. Dugan characterized the results, however, as “surprising” for regulators. Dugan’s remarks came during a panel discussion with Office of Thrift Supervision director John Reich, Federal Reserve Board chairman Donald Kohn, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chairman Sheila Bair, and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart.

Dugan suggested that regulators weren’t sure why redefault rates were so high. “Is it because the modifications did not reduce monthly payments enough to be truly affordable to the borrowers? Is it because consumers replaced lower mortgage payments with increased credit card debt? Is it because the mortgages were so badly underwritten that the borrowers simply could not afford them, even with reduced monthly payments? Or is it a combination of these and other factors?”

snip....

paul.jackson@housingwire.com.


________________________________________________

Here's a HINT... No matter HOW low the "interest rate is". a $15 hr wage CANNOT pay for a $300K house..

This does not even include insurance & taxes

$1,432.52
Monthly Payment

Loan Amount:
Interest Rate:
Term of Loan:
$300,000
4.000%
30 years (fixed)

even a loan that's been "modified" down to 4% will eat up at least $400 per week of a takehome paycheck (with taxes & insurance)..That $400 out, has to leave enough for the payment of utilities, food, gasoline, car insurance, cay payments, child care, medical expenses, phone, etc.

IF a $15 an hour employee HAD a 40 hour week, their check would be around $600 BEFORE taxes..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC