You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter Opposed Confirmation of Elena Kagan, Potential Obama Supreme Court Nominee [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 10:33 AM
Original message
Specter Opposed Confirmation of Elena Kagan, Potential Obama Supreme Court Nominee
Advertisements [?]
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/president-obama/specter-opposed-confirmation-of-potential-obama-supreme-court-nominee/

The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog
Specter Opposed Confirmation Of Potential Obama Supreme Court Nominee


Here’s a sign that Obama and Dems may not be able to count on much help from newly-minted Democrat Arlen Specter in the fight to get his eventual Supreme Court justice confirmed:

Recall that earlier this year, Specter came out strongly against the nomination of Elena Kagan, Obama’s pick for the post of Solicitor General. Kagan is one of several people who’s being talked about as a potential Supreme Court pick for Obama.

Specter raised concerns about Kagan’s positions on the death penalty, her earlier work for Ruth Bader Ginsberg, her claim that Ginsberg is a “moderate,” her views on judicial activism, and other things, according to his written questions for her at the time.

While Specter didn’t ultimately pass judgment on her answers, he rejected her because he maintained she hadn’t answered his questions to his satisfaction, and his line of questioning suggests a hostility to anyone with liberal to moderate legal views.

Indeed, Specter was pretty elusive on why he opposed her, which also suggests that he’d be unreliable at best as an ally in the Supreme Court fight.

So for all the talk we keep hearing about how Specter is putting Dems within reach of the 60 Senate votes they need to break the GOP filibuster, there’s little reason to imagine that he’d be likely to help in this regard on what will prove one of the biggest and most consequential Senate fights of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC