Lots of Woodstock era smokers never had the good stuff. But then again, some of us did. :smoke: You can find shitty pot in any era. And you can find good pot now too. To think that superb weed didn't exist before you did is ignorant and arrogant.
The fact is, that regardless of your age, you have no experience to counter what I have. I was there, and you weren't. What's your definition of experience? Do you think your experiences of the sixties are better than mine? am I discounting them too much? :rofl:
So why should I (or anyone) accept your assertions when you claim experience for a time before you were born? And personal attacks make your arguments seem even weaker. And without one single fact to support you, you denigrate my life experience. :cry:
I think you don't understand why growers use hydroponics. Assertions that a product is X times "better" because it was grown hydroponically don't exist for anything else. Can you name anything that is many times better because it is grown without soil? I didn't think so.
Now, let's see if you're educable (or just here for your own reasons.) Check out this
hydro vs soil thread at 420 Magazine. This is a discussion by growers. Nobody there makes any magic claims about hydroponics, like you do. The growers are split down the middle on which they prefer. Are you gonna give them the benefit of your experience? (BTW, how many crops have you brought in? You think living in Humboldt for 24 years makes you an expert? You didn't say how old you were when you arrived there.) But I don't think you're here to learn anything. You're here for the argument.
--imm