Reply #45: Actually - Your Wrong..... You need to read Citizen's United Brief

[FreakinDJ]

Because Citizen United’s narrower arguments are not sustainable, this Court must, in an exercise of its judicial responsibility, consider §441b’s facial validity. Any other course would prolong the substantial, nationwide chilling effect caused by §441b’s corporate expenditure ban.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-205.ZS.html

Nothing in the Law deterred a PERSON from excessing their inalienable Right to Free Speech

Further more the FEC law "Restricted Corporate Expenditures" NOT the Expenditures of People

Is a Corporation a Person?
Riddle me that Bro..............