You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corporate personhood should not be a novel concept in a liberal forum [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Corporate personhood should not be a novel concept in a liberal forum
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 01:28 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
The widespread DU discussion of corporate person-hood as if it's something that started in 2010 is odd. It's a big deal and a very old deal.

Corporate person-hood is a central problem in American life and has been since at least 1886.

This is one of our ancient progressive struggles, not breaking news.

The general concept is enshrined on the very first page of the US Legal Code:
1 U.S.C. §1

"In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise-- the words "person" and "whoever" include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;"

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/1/1.html
Corporations (and other types of associative entities) must have some de facto person-hood insofar as they can enter into contracts, be able to sue people for not honoring contracts, etc..

That, the limited 1819 state of things, is not very controversial.

The problem arises when that person-hood is expanded beyond the bare minimum legal fiction of person-hood that is requisite to corporations being able to act on par with individuals as economic entities.

Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) held that the person-hood of being able to enter into contracts meant that corporations are covered as persons by the 14th Amendment. This has always been one of our most controversial Supreme Court decisions. The 14th Amendment is very powerful and broad.

The downsides of over-extrapolation of corporate person-hood are endless. One famous one is that corporations cannot go to jail for crimes like negligent homicide but individual corporate officers who commit negligent homicide don't go to jail either because it's the corporation's fault.

(There was a pip of a negligent homicide trial involving Ford Motors employees/officers who knowingly went ahead with the flammable Ford Pinto. Everyone was acquitted because it was really Ford inc. that was doing it. Ford inc. was, however, never tried in criminal court because it's not THAT much of a person.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC