You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colorado Attorney General joining a national lawsuit against HCR [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 02:40 AM
Original message
Colorado Attorney General joining a national lawsuit against HCR
Advertisements [?]
Colorado Attorney General John Suthers is joining a national lawsuit to try to block federal health care legislation -- over the objections of Gov. Bill Ritter and the Democrats who control the state Legislature.

Suthers said Monday he would join fellow Republican attorneys general in at least nine other states in opposing the bill because he thinks a provision requiring most Americans to purchase insurance is an unconstitutional expansion of federal power. Congress has the right to control interstate commerce but can't force people to participate in commerce, he said.

"Never before has Congress compelled Americans, under the threat of economic sanction, to purchase a particular product or service as a condition of living in this country," Suthers said.

Republican state lawmakers had called on him earlier in the day to join the lawsuit. But Suthers, the only Republican elected to statewide office, said he reached his decision on his own and said it wasn't politically motivated.

Melissa Hart, associate professor at the University of Colorado and director of the Byron White Center for the Study of American Constitutional Law, disagreed with Suthers' interpretation.

"I think it's a very radical interpretation of the 10th Amendment," Hart said. "I think it will fail and I think it's very political."

Hart says the language in the 10th Amendment is very open-ended and could mean a lot of different things, but added that Suthers' interpretation was "very aggressive."

More
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=389

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC