You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: The question asked in the OP is not relevant - Proof of legal presence is required, not citizenship [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
67. The question asked in the OP is not relevant - Proof of legal presence is required, not citizenship
Edited on Sun Apr-25-10 10:37 AM by slackmaster
A driver's license is proof of legal presence in Arizona, and in most other states.

There's a lot of heat and not much light in these forums regarding the new Arizona immigration enforcement law. Most of us, including the author of the OP, don't appear to have even read it.

K&U

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC