You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Will's wind energy claims are for the birds -fact check [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-10 10:04 AM
Original message
George Will's wind energy claims are for the birds -fact check
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue May-04-10 10:06 AM by G_j
http://mediamatters.org/research/201005040009?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mediamatters%2Flatest+%28Media+Matters+-+Latest+Items%29

EXCLUSIVE: George Will's wind energy claims are for the birds


Continuing his pattern of pushing environmental misinformation, Washington Post columnist George Will downplayed the potential long-term impact of the oil spill on bird populations and the environment in general, saying on ABC's This Week that "wind farms kill a lot more birds daily than are probably going to be killed in this oil spill." In fact, the number of birds killed by wind farms is relatively small compared to other causes.

Will cited bird deaths to downplay environmental impact of oil spill and criticize wind energy

Will: "Wind farms kill a lot more birds daily than are probably going to be killed in this oil spill." On the May 2 edition of ABC's This Week, Will stated that "wind farms kill a lot more birds daily than are probably going to be killed in this oil spill."

Will: American Bird Conservancy estimates wind turbines kill between 75-275,000 birds a year. In an April 9 Newsweek column, Will wrote:

Wind power involves gargantuan "energy sprawl." To produce 20 percent of America's power by wind, which the Obama administration dreamily proposes, would require 186,000 tall turbines -- 40 stories tall, their flashing lights can be seen for 20 miles -- covering an area the size of West Virginia. The amount of electricity that would be produced by wind turbines extending the entire 2,178 miles of the Appalachian Trail can be produced by four reactors occupying four square miles of land. And birds beware: the American Bird Conservancy estimates that the existing 25,000 turbines kill between 75,000 and 275,000 birds a year. Imagine the toll that 186,000 turbines would take.
In fact, compared to other causes, wind farms kill relatively small number of birds

Number of bird deaths from wind farms relatively small compared to other causes. According to the most recent figures provided to Media Matters from the American Bird Conservancy, whom Will cited in his Newsweek column, the number of birds killed in the United States every year because of striking windmills is relatively small compared to other causes:

CAUSE
BIRTH DEATHS

Building strikes
100 million - 1 billion

Car strikes
200 - 300 million

Communication towers
4 - 50 million

Power lines
~75 million

Cats
365 million (1 million per day)

Wind farms
100,000 - 300,000
American Bird Conservancy supportive of wind energy if done right

Conservancy's Johns: "We like wind energy. ...just do it right." In a May 3 interview, Bob Johns, American Bird Conservancy director of Public Relations told Media Matters: "We like wind energy. We think it's clean. We're saying just do it right, get it right, and we'll be singing your praises."

Johns: Wind farms should be "sited properly" to avoid "migration corridors." Johns told Media Matters that in order to reduce the number of bird deaths caused by wind farms, the turbines should be "sited properly" to avoid being situated in fragile environments and in "migration corridors." In addition, Johns stated that U.S. wind farms should adopt technology presently in use in Europe that allows turbine blades to shut down when flocks of birds fly through. Johns also stated: "We are hearing that the government is ready to announce new guidelines . Those guidelines should not be voluntary. The wind industry standards should not be any different than any other industry."

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC