You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So taboo, that no public official would ever admit to it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 08:54 PM
Original message
So taboo, that no public official would ever admit to it
Advertisements [?]
There's something that is so taboo, so distasteful to a majority of Americans, that those who are like this dare not admit it publicly because of the repercussions for their career, their family life, and their friendships.

Those that publicly come out and admit they are like this are sometimes:

- shunned by co-workers and acquaintances
- disowned by family members
- denied employment
- deemed unelectable for most public offices
- sometimes even physically accosted or even killed

When I came out to my parents that I was like this, my mother didn't talk to me for a month. Even now, whenever we talk, she peppers the conversation with scripture in a weak attempt to get me to change.

It is something only my closest friends know about me. Shamefully, I sometimes pretend to be something I am not in order to avoid public scrutiny or lose friends.

I am not alone. Public officials who are like me in this regard often stage photo ops to make it appear to the public that they are just like everyone else. They'll say things they know are not true about themselves in order to avoid losing their jobs.

With all this talk about "is she or isn't she?" regarding Elena Kagan, there is one thing that she could never admit to without immediately disqualifying herself for consideration for the Supreme Court.

Homosexuality? Goodness no.


I'm speaking of atheism.


I defy anyone to name one prominent political figure that has admitted to being an atheist and still managed to hold on to their position.


I long for the day when the Constitution's prohibition of a religious litmus test as a qualification for high office is actually true in practice, instead of just in theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC