You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Always liked Andrea Mitchell - UNTIL TODAY [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
fadedrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 04:50 PM
Original message
Always liked Andrea Mitchell - UNTIL TODAY
Advertisements [?]
Boy did she skewer Sestak today...She seemed angry with him from the minute he sat down.

She started by saying that Sestak was misrepresenting Specter's voting record, that he did not always vote with Bush and that he voted with Dems many times. Sestak agreed, saying that Harry Reid had said that Specter was always there when they didn't need him.

Sestak responded by saying that Specter voted with Bush and Cheney on the Iraq war, the tax increase, and...and then Mitchell interrupted him. Then Sestak says that it was nice that Specter voted for the Stimulus package - because his votes caused the conditions that brought about the need for a stimulus package. Sestak could answer anything, and the better he did, the angrier she seemed to get.

What really got me mad was when she accused Sestak of insensitivity, cruelty, whatever, because he said that Specter was a "dead walking man." Anybody who reads mystery novels or watched the "Sopranos," knows that that expression means a person's life was over - not due to age or physical condition, but because they rubbed somebody the wrong way and it was just a matter of time. That's how Sestak meant it - it had nothing to do with Specter's cancer or old age - he was at the end of his political life because he rubbed people the wrong way. Sestak said that Specter could not win in November.

Andrea is markedly for Specter. And she must be an optimist to think that an 80-year old man will live the 6 years - and that's MY opinion, not Sestak's. Mike Barnacle came on shortly after Sestak and he had no smile or friendly greeting for Mitchell. I think he shared my disapproval of her interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC