You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saving Social Security: The Right Message on the Catfood Commission [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:33 PM
Original message
Saving Social Security: The Right Message on the Catfood Commission
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue May-25-10 10:37 PM by Karmadillo
There are a lot of links in the snippet below I'm too tired to put in. It's worth a click to go to Corrente to access the entire article. The oligarchy has taken a lot from us as of late. We shouldn't let them have social security.

http://www.correntewire.com/right_message

The progressive counter-attack against the President's emerging “austerity” political strategy and program is beginning to emerge. In the last few days, we've seen posts by Nancy Altman and Eric Kingson of Social Security Works, Jane Hamsher, Robert Kuttner, and Dean Baker writing against the thrust by the Administration, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, the Peter G. Peterson Foundation and its network of related organizations, and the deficit hawks in the Congress, seemingly aimed at Social Security. These posts make or imply a number of points sometimes in the form of questions. They are:

-- The commission is unaccountable.

-- It meets in secret.

-- Its members will keep their recommendations secret until after the election, and then will present them to a lame duck Congress that is itself unaccountable.

-- That Congress will avoid open hearings, and debates, and also floor amendments in the House and Senate on the recommendations.

-- The Commission lacks diversity in both opinion and also in racial and gender makeup.

-- The Commission members appear to have already made up their minds that America's fiscal problems are mainly due to over-spending rather than under-taxing, and, even though they insist, that everything is”on the table” seem to have decided that military spending can't be cut.

-- The co-chairs, Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, based on public remarks they've made appear to have a clear agenda oriented toward cutting Social Security and Medicare.

-- Since the Commission appears to have already made up its mond about its findings, it's whole process is just a way of avoiding accountability in the upcoming elections. It's all just an end-run around the democratic process

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC