You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU.
Reply #39: Rest assured, that was facetious.
[View All]
Matsubara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-14-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
39. Rest assured, that was facetious. |
|
But under the rationale the Hiroshima-rationalizers use, North Vietnam would have been fair game for nukes(as if napalm and hundreds of thousands of land mines weren't enough).
Looking at the whole, I think what we did to Vietnam was actually much worse than what we did to Japan, but it is another topic.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.