You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Because [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Because
1. What right? If an individual is in the service, then s/he is a potential target. Simply put, if I'm going to be shot at, I'd like to shoot back, at least be able to. Because of the combat restriction, servicewomen use to be ban even from small arms training. Further, care to define combat -- civil riot, nuclear exchange, all the possibilities in between?

2. Especially for officers, combat and combat related fields are the fast track to command and promotion; that's as it should be. However, can you say glass ceiling, uneven playing field, no playing field?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC