Reply #22: that's for a trial

[TorchTheWitch]

When does the public ever get to see the evidence in ANY case? And in a case like this where it's the word of the two women against his word what evidence IS there? It's a classic he said/she said case. That's what makes most rape cases so damn difficult - lack of evidence as to consent. It's no wonder so many women who have been sexually abused by some guy that thinks anything goes even when they're told to stop don't even bother going to the police. And no wonder there are so many guys that think they can do anything they want with a women who agrees to have sex with them ignoring any stipulations and continuing when told to stop or even inflicts themselves on some women that never agreed to have sex with him because she's passed out or asleep or otherwise rendered unable to give consent... nothing ever happens to them.

What is so outrageous is anyone completely disbelieving even the possibility that this is what happened and that he may actually be guilty. Nobody here even KNOWS the guy at all yet are dead certain that there is not even the slightest possibility that he may actually be guilty and for no other reason than they like what he does with Wikileaks. THAT is what is so outrageous.